Skip to content

“shields-up”

The truth lies half way down the slippery slope… (Shields’ Axiom)

Menu
  • Home
  • about
  • warp speed
Menu

bible codes, part II: gematria

Posted on Thursday, 20th November, 2008Thursday, 22nd September, 2022 by martin

Having previously discussed the Bible’s use of Atbash codes, it is time to look at the other type of code probably found in the Bible (as opposed to those people erroneously see there), that is, gematria.1 Before going too far, if you don’t have decent unicode support in you OS and browser, you’re going to miss some of the fun below.

Gematria is the calculation of numerical values of words based on the assignment of values to the letters used to write the words. The obvious example of the use of gematria in the Bible is in Rev 13:18 where we are told: “let the one who has insight calculate the beast’s number, for it is man’s number, and his number is 666” (i.e. ο εχων νουν ψηφισατω τον αριθμον του θηριου, αριθμος γαρ ανθρωπου εστιν, και ο αριθμος αυτου εξακοσιοι εξηκοντα εξ, English from NET).

Assuming that this is an example of gematria, the number 666 would be calculated by adding the numeric values of the letters found in a word. The usual way this is done follows a specific scheme whereby the letters of the alphabet are assigned increasing values. Obviously much depends on what numerical values are assigned to each letter! The most common approach is particularly suited to Greek, because (with the inclusion of some obsolete letters) the values round out nicely, as follows:

Α Β Γ Δ Ε Ϝ Ζ Η Θ
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
 
Ι Κ Λ Μ Ν Ξ Ο Π Ϙ
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
 
Ρ Σ Τ Υ Φ Χ Ψ Ω Ϡ
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900


Now if you’re familiar with NT Greek you’ll probably notice a couple of odd things about the tables above: the “additional” letters Ϝ (digamma), Ϙ (qoppa), and Ϡ (sampi). These letters had dropped out of normal use by NT times, but appear to have remained in use for representing numbers. To complicate matters slightly, Ϝ (digamma) was sometimes replaced with Ϛ (stigma, not to be confused with ς the final sigma) in later manuscripts.

By way of contrast, the system when applied to Hebrew doesn’t quite look as complete:

א ב ג ד ה ו ז ח ט
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
 
י כ ל מ נ ס ע פ צ
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
 
ק ר ש ת  
100 200 300 400  


Hebrew simply runs out of letters. Some extend the Hebrew to include final forms of letters to cover the remaining values from 500–900, but this appears to be a modern innovation (and it certainly couldn’t be pre-exilic when the Hebrew script differed to that used today). This is also sometimes taken as an indication that this system of assigning numerical values to the Hebrew alphabet was not a native innovation.

However, there is archaeological evidence indicating that around 700 BC and earlier Egyptian Hieratic numbers were used with Hebrew in Israel (for designating weights, for example). Hieratic used a decimal system with symbols for 1–9, then 10–90, then 100–900, and so on. In other words, the value sequence employed in normal gematria calculations of Hebrew and Greek could reflect an adaptation of this sort of numerical annotation.2

Anyway, time for an example. The number 666 is taken by some to point to Nero Caesar because in Hebrew his name is supposedly written נרון קסר which totals 666. One problem with this is the lack of evidence for the use of Hebrew letters to represent numbers: the evidence is rather sparse with but a couple of possible examples BC, and not until around the 7th century AD is there good evidence for the widespread use of the Hebrew alphabet for numerical values.

Now assuming that 666 really is an instance of gematria, and keeping things in Greek, there are no names in the NT whose value amounts to 666. The closest are Αρφαξαδ = 667, Ραιφαν = 662, and Φοινικη = 668. Σατανας is way out at 753, Ιουδας is closer at 685. If we expand to look for nouns, then we get a couple of matches: ευπορια and παραδοσις (which only goes to show that wealth and tradition are bad!).

What about the LXX, I hear you ask! Well, now we find some proper nouns with precise matches: Βεελτεθμος (1Esd 2:19), Συηνη (Ezek 29:10; 30:6, 16), and Χελκια (1Chr 9:11).

Now for those of you who may want to play a little here, I’ve included the following calculator. Simply type (or paste) unicode Hebrew or Greek and the value of the word(s) you type should appear below (if you’re using a reasonably modern web browser).

Update: The calculator will now even calculate values for English, so give it a go, see if you’re name returns 666!

Unicode:
Calculated value = 0


This calls for wisdom: let the one who has insight calculate the author’s number, for it is a man’s number, and his number is 771!


1. I say “probably” because, although many assume that Rev 13:18 is an example of gematria, there remains some doubt and there remain some who argue for alternate significance. It may be, for example, that if “7” is the number of completeness, then “666” represents a triple shortfall (and, who knows, then it may become significant the Ιησους has a numerical value of “888”!). Alternatively, some claim herein lies a link to other instances of this number in the Bible (see 1Kings 10:14; 1Chr 9:13; Ezra 2:13).

2. There appears to be one innovation in Hebrew numbering. To avoid writing the common abbreviations of the divine name, numbers 15 and 16 were written as טו and טז — i.e. 9+6 and 9+7 respectively.

9 thoughts on “bible codes, part II: gematria”

  1. jeremy says:
    Thursday, 20th November, 2008 at 11:43 pm

    Interestingly, Ιησους is 888.

  2. jeremy says:
    Thursday, 20th November, 2008 at 11:47 pm

    oops. you already mentioned it! Please delete my comments if you wish!

  3. martin says:
    Friday, 21st November, 2008 at 12:05 am

    Jeremy, I’ll leave you comment to highlight this obscure point down there in the footnote! Maybe I’ll add a page here with the calculator, an English version, and even an Atbash version in the days to come.

    Won’t that be fun?

  4. Jim says:
    Friday, 21st November, 2008 at 2:54 am

    Ah, my full given name = 1110. Sweet! (I don’t know why but there you have it).

  5. martin says:
    Friday, 21st November, 2008 at 11:20 am

    Jim, it is obvious, is it not that 1110 give 1 + 1 + 1 + 0 = 3, the number of the Trinity, and that there are four digits such that 3 + 4 = 7, the number of completion. I hope this revelation doesn’t give you any messianic pretensions!

  6. Jim says:
    Saturday, 22nd November, 2008 at 3:15 am

    well that’s even more fantastic!

  7. Pingback: more numerical fun
  8. helen says:
    Friday, 3rd December, 2010 at 4:56 pm

    ok i put my full given name in and it’s 1318, kind of freaked me out seeing as the refernce to 666 in the bible is revelations 13:18

  9. phil says:
    Wednesday, 15th December, 2010 at 3:31 pm

    Put in Godslove and it comes up 666, that is disconcerting

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • 1 timothy
  • 1kings
  • Accordance
  • Apple
  • archaeology
  • bible
  • blogging
  • Book Review
  • Books
  • dead sea scrolls
  • deuteronomy
  • exercise
  • genesis
  • greek
  • hebrew
  • isaiah
  • jeremiah
  • job
  • judges
  • languages
  • matthew
  • mellel
  • music
  • new testament
  • old testament
  • physics
  • proverbs
  • psalms
  • qohelet
  • sci fi
  • science
  • song of songs
  • theodicy
  • theology
  • translation
  • uncategorized
  • weather
  • wikipedia
  • wisdom literature
  • February 2025
  • January 2024
  • January 2023
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • October 2015
  • August 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • February 2014
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • March 2013
  • May 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
© 2025 “shields-up” | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme